HOMART DEVELOPMENT CO.

v.

DIAMOND ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Errol Ricardo Bizzard, 674 F.2d 1382 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …o the defense or might have affected the outcome of the trial. United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 104, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2397-2398, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1975); Moore v. Illinois, 408 U.S. 786, 794-95, 92 S.Ct. 2562, 2567-2568, 33 L.Ed.2d 706, reh. denied, 409 U.S. 897, 93 S.Ct. 87, 34 L.Ed.2d 155 (1972); United States v. Anderson, 574 F. 2d 1347, 1353 (5th Cir. 1978). [*1387] Department of Justice Judicial Administration The district court quashed a subpoena by which defendant attempted to call as a witness a fo…
• United States ex rel. Lyman A. Moore v. Brierton, 560 F.2d 288 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …2d 73, 246 N.E. 2d 299 (1969). The United States Supreme Court affirmed the conviction but reversed the judgment as to the death sentence imposed and remanded the case. Moore v. Illinois, 408 U.S. 786, 92 S.Ct. 2562, 33 L.Ed.2d 706 (1972), reh. den. 409 U.S. 897, 93 S.Ct. 87, 34 L.Ed.2d 155. On remand, the state trial court then sentenced the petitioner to the term of 60 to 100 years’ imprisonment, which he is presently serving. After his resentencing, the petitioner filed a second post-conviction petition…
• United States v. Wilcox, 507 F.2d 364 (4th Cir. 1974)
  …in admitting the testimony of these two witnesses will not justify reversal. Their testimony was not exculpatory and was accordingly not within the Brady rule. Moore v. Illinois (1972) 408 U.S. 786, 794-798, 92 S.Ct. 2562, 33 L.Ed.2d 706, reh. den., 409 U.S. 897, 93 S.Ct. 87, 34 L.Ed.2d 155; United States v. Anderson (4th Cir. 1973), 481 F. 2d 685, 689-691, aff., 211 U.S. 417, 94 S.Ct. 2253, 41 L.Ed.2d 21. Even had the government procured statements from these witnesses in memoranda setting forth their test…