NORTHERN ACCEPTANCE TRUST 1065

v.

BRINKERHOFF ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Batterton v. Francis, 432 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1977)
  …he state regulation but went on to hold it invalid because it was contrary to the federal regulation prescribing standards for the determination of unemployment under the AFDC-UF program. Francis v. Davidson, 340 F. Supp. 351 (Md.), summarily aff’d, 409 U. S. 904 (1972) (Francis I). Although HEW did not agree that its regulation was inconsistent with Rule 200.X.(A) (2), the Solicitor General, in his memorandum for the United States as amicus curiae, filed in Francis I at this Court’s invitation, 408 U. S. 92…
• Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp., 426 U.S. 794 (U.S. 1976)
  …l question. For even those courts and commentators that have concluded that facially restrictive state purchasing statutes are permissible under the Commerce Clause, e. g., American Yearbook Co. v. Askew, 339 F. Supp. 719 (MD Fla.), summarily aff’d, 409 U. S. 904 (1972); McAllister, Court, Congress and Trade Barriers, 16 Ind. L. J. 144, 164r-165 (1940), have restricted this conclusion to instances where the State in a “proprietary” capacity is purchasing items of commerce for end use, and have distinguished…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (U.S. 1980)
  …District Court upheld a Florida statute requiring the State to obtain needed printing services from in-state shops. It reasoned that “state proprietary functions” are exempt from Commerce Clause scrutiny. Id., at 725. This Court affirmed summarily. 409 U. S. 904 (1972). Numerous courts have rebuffed Commerce Clause challenges directed at similar preferences that exist in “a substantial majority of the states.” Note, 58 Iowa L. Rev. 576 (1973). City of Phoenix v. Superior Court, 109 Ariz. 533, 535, 514 P…

  ← 1 / 2 →