AMOS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ALABAMA, ET AL.

v.

SIMS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (67 total)

• Postell v. State, 398 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …efendant’s right of confrontation is defeated, notwithstanding that the actual statements made by the non-testifying witness are not repeated.5 In so holding, we announce no novel rule. In Favre v. Henderson, 464 F. 2d 359 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942, 93 S.Ct. 235, 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972), as in the present case, the critical issue was identification of the defendant. The identification of the defendant was shown by “two tentative identifications,” “one dubious positive identification,” and “one v…
• Tresvant v. State, 396 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …tatement made out of court, such statement being offered to show the truth of the matters asserted therein, and thus resting for its value upon the credibility of the out-of-court asserter. Favre v. Henderson, 464 F. 2d 359 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 942, 93 S.Ct. 235, 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972). The admissibility vel non against Tresvant of Dino’s statements to Flory depends on whether the State, by proof independent of this and like hearsay, established that Dino and Tresvant participated in this consp…
• In re Apportionment LAW Appearing AS Senate Joint Resolution 1 E, 414 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1982)
  …cising its discretion in allowing these senators to hold over. See Sims v. Amos, 336 F.Supp. 924 (M.D.Ala.) (although recognizing its power to order mid-term elections as plan unconstitutional, court refrains from so doing at its discretion), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942, 93 S.Ct. 290, 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972). . Reliance on Swann v. Adams by the majority is particularly inappropriate since that case did not interpret the provision now before us. . Colo.Const., art. V, § 48(l)(a), provides, “the senatorial districts…