PRATT ET AL.

v.

BEGLEY, SECRETARY OF STATE OF KENTUCKY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 (U.S. 1983)
  …Court of Appeals reversed. It first inferred that the Court’s summary affirmances in Sweetenham v. Rhodes, 318 F. Supp. 1262 (SD Ohio 1970), summarily aff’d, 409 U. S. 942 (1972), and Pratt v. Begley, 352 F. Supp. 328 (ED Ky. 1970), summarily aff’d, 409 U. S. 943 (1972), had implicitly sustained the validity of early filing deadlines. Then, correctly recognizing the limited precedential effect to be accorded summary dispositions,5 the Court of Appeals independently [*785] reached the same conclusion. It held…
• Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U.S. 836 (U.S. 1973)
  …by jury is not constitutionally required in this state civil proceeding pursuant to § 18.1-236.3 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. See Melancon v. McKeithen, 345 F. Supp. 1025, 1027, 1035-1045, 1048 (ED La.), aff'd sub nom. Mayes v. Ellis, 409 U. S. 943 (1972), and Hill v. McKeithen [*837], 409 U. S. 943 (1972). Cf. Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U. S. 436, 443-444 (1957). Vacated and remanded. Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Virginia. See Miller v. Cal…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litig. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp. & Nat'l Union Elec. Corp., 631 F.2d 1069 (3d Cir. 1980)
  ….S. 319, 324-25, 58 S.Ct. 149, 151, 82 L.Ed. 288 (1937); Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U.S. 151, 158, 52 S.Ct. 69, 71, 76 L.Ed. 214 (1931); Melancon v. McKeithen, 345 F.Supp. 1025 (E.D.La.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem. 409 U.S. 943, 93 S.Ct. 289, 34 L.Ed.2d 214 (1972), 409 U.S. 1098, 93 S.Ct. 908, 24 L.Ed.2d 679 (1972). Appellees argue that the due process objection to jury trials carries less weight than the preservation of the right to jury trial because it concerns a “hypo…