PIERCE

v.

GEORGIA

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Cook v. State, 542 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1989)
  …to disturb a trial judge’s exercise of discretion, absent clear abuse, than in ruling on challenges for cause in the empanelling of a jury. United States v. Ploof, 464 F. 2d 116, 118-19 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Godin v. United States, 409 U.S. 952, 93 S.Ct. 298, 34 L.Ed.2d 224 (1972). Accord United States v. Rouco, 765 F. 2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124, 106 S.Ct. 1646, 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlin, 698 F. 2d 1133 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958,…
• Suri v. State, 937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …f discretion, absent clear abuse, than in ruling on challenges for cause in the empanel-ling of a jury.’” Id. at 969 (emphasis added)(quoting United States v. Ploof, 464 F. 2d 116, 118-19 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Godin v. United States, 409 U.S. 952, 93 S.Ct. 298, 34 L.Ed.2d 224 (1972)). Given the broad discretion which trial courts enjoy in evaluating the competency of a juror and the great deference an appellate court must afford the trial court when reviewing these determinations, a trial c…
• Rogers v. United States, 422 U.S. 35 (U.S. 1975)
  …ner in this case and may continue to do mischief in future prosecutions brought under § 871, I would reverse on this ground rather than on the Solicitor General’s confession of error. See United States v. Lincoln, 462 F. 2d 1368 (CA6), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 952 (1972); United States v. Hart, 457 F. 2d 1087 (CA10), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 861 (1972); United States v. Compton, 428 F. 2d 18 (CA2 1970), cert. denied, 401 U. S. 1014 (1971); Roy v. United States, 416 F. 2d 874 (CA9 1969); Watts v. United States,…