TRIBBLET

v.

SALISBURY, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Cyrus T. Anderson, 509 F.2d 312 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …road proposition stated. The difficulty is that a layman could hardly be expected to fully grasp the significance of those words as a suitable qualification. . See United States v. Mack, 151 U.S.App. D.C. 162, 167, 466 F. 2d 333, 338, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 952, 93 S.Ct. 297, 34 L.Ed.2d 223 (1972); Brooke v. United States, 128 U.S.App. D.C. 19, 24, 385 F. 2d 279, 284 (1967), and cases cited note 17 therein. . See note 1, supra. . See Parts 1(A), (B), supra. . E. g., Johnson v. United States, 138 U.S. Ap…
• United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …clined to disturb a trial judge’s exercise of discretion, absent clear abuse, than in ruling on challenges for cause in the empaneling of a jury.” Id. at 1135 n. 7 (quoting United States v. Ploof, 464 F. 2d 116, 118-19 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 952, 93 S.Ct. 298, 34 L.Ed.2d 224 (1972). We find no abuse in the court’s decision here. Defense counsel’s second attack on Mrs. Flores’ qualifications to serve as a juror came during the government’s ease in chief, when the informant who introduced Ag…
• United States v. Kelner, 534 F.2d 1020 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …. 266, 45 L.Ed.2d 696 (1975); United States v. Rogers, 488 F. 2d 512, 514 (5th Cir. 1974), rev’d and remanded on other grounds, 422 U.S. 35, 95 S.Ct. 2091, 45 L.Ed.2d 1 (1975); United States v. Lincoln, 462 F. 2d 1368, 1369 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 952, 93 S.Ct. 298, 34 L.Ed.2d 224 (1972); United States v. Hart, 457 F. 2d 1087, 1090-91 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 861, 93 S.Ct. 150, 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972); United States v. Compton, 428 F. 2d 18, 21 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1014…