HARRY SIMON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RUTH SIMON, DECEASED, AND HARRY SIMON, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANT,

v.

CHARLES E. KELLY, BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION, INC., AN ALABAMA CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Starchk v. Wittenberg, 411 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …ey is charging a criminal contempt of court. See, e.g., Ex parte Maniscalco, 153 Fla. 666, 15 So. 2d 445 (1943); Ex parte Crews, 127 Fla. 381, 173 So. 275 (1937); Vernell v. State ex rel. Gerstein, 212 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Diebert v. State, 199 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Appellee’s reliance on Baumgartner v. Joughin, 107 Fla. 858, 143 So. 436 (1936), is misplaced. Baumgartner deals with the separate issue of the adequacy of a habeas corpus writ to attack the factual basis of an order adjudicatin…
• Sauls v. State, 354 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …at he never went to 765 N.W. 42nd Street and 8741 N.W. 21st Court on four consecutive Saturdays in April, 1976. See: Baumgartner v. Joughin, 105 Fla. 335, 141 So. 185 (1932); Cunningham v. State, 337 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Diebert v. State, 199 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). In general, a contemptuous act is “any act which is calculated to interfere with, hinder or obstruct the proper administration of justice”. Dodd v. State, 110 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), quoting from 6 FlaJur., Contempt, § 18.…
• Diebert v. State, 201 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1967)
  …PER CURIAM. In this case, the District Court of Appeal, Third District, 199 So. 2d 288, certified its decision filed February 14, 1967 as one passing upon a question of great public interest. It stated the certified question as follows: “Whether a judge may issue a rule to show cause in an indirect contempt pro [*727] ceeding based s…