HANLY ET AL.

v.

KLEINDIENST, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (U.S. 1975)
  …nning v. General Motors Corp., 466 F. 2d 812 (CA6 1972), cert. denied, 410 U. S. 946 (1973); Schaeffer v. San Diego Yellow Cabs, Inc., 462 F. 2d 1002 (CA9 1972); LeBlanc v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 460 F. 2d 1228 (CA5), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 990 (1972). In such a case, the employer may be thrust onto the horns of a dilemma: either he must violate Title VII or he must violate a presumptively valid state law. Even though good-faith reliance on the state statute may not exonerate an employer…
• Rush Pettway v. Am. Cast Iron Pipe Co., 494 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …nied, 410 U.S. 946, 93 S.Ct. 1366, 35 L.Ed.2d 613 (1973); Weeks v. Southern Bell T & T Co., 408 F. 2d 228 (5th Cir. 1969); LeBlanc v. Southern Bell T & T Co., 333 F.Supp. 602 (E.D.La.1971), aff’d. per curiam, 460 F. 2d 1228 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 990, 93 S.Ct. 320, 34 L.Ed. 2d 257 (1972). . Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., supra, 416 F. 2d 711 (weight lifting limitation). . Compare Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Co., 444 F. 2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1971) with Schaeffer v. San Diego Yellow Cabs, supra, 4…
• Aberdeen & Rockfish R.R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (scrap), 422 U.S. 289 (U.S. 1975)
  …ICC makes in a general revenue proceeding is by law far more confined than, for example, that- of an agency deciding whether and where to build a new prison. E. g., Hanly v. Mitchell, 460 F. 2d 640 (CA2), cert. denied sub nom. Hanly v. Kleindienst, 409 U. S. 990 (1972). The ICC is permitted to act against proposed rate increases, for more than a seven-month period, only if upon the basis of its investigation it can find that the rates are unlawful, i. e., unjust or unreasonable, or otherwise in violation…