KAPLAN ET AL.

v.

MILLIKEN, JUDGE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dalzotto, 603 F.2d 642 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …e existence of the conspiracy was already established. Mancillas, supra, and United States v. Holmes, 452 F. 2d 249 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1016, 92 S.Ct. 1302, 31 L.Ed.2d 479, 407 U.S. 909, 92 S.Ct. 2433, 32 L.Ed.2d 683 reh. denied, 409 U.S. 1002, 93 S.Ct. 305, 34 L.Ed.2d 264 (1972). Compare Quintana, supra and Baker, supra. Two factors distinguish the case before us from those cited above. First, presence is put forward here to establish the existence of the conspiracy merely as a precondi…
• United States v. Davis, 623 F.2d 188 (1st Cir. 1980)
  …1460, 47 L.Ed.2d 732 (1976), rehearing denied, 425 U.S. 985, 96 S.Ct. 2193, 48 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976), quoting United States v. Guy, 456 F. 2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 896, 93 S.Ct. 136, 34 L.Ed.2d 153 (1972), rehearing denied, 409 U.S. 1002, 93 S.Ct. 327, 34 L.Ed.2d 263 (1972); Wood v. United States, 361 F. 2d 802 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 978, 87 S.Ct. 520, 17 L.Ed.2d 439 (1966). The court finds that there is substantial evidence viewed in the light most favorable to th…
• Newhouse v. Robert's Ilima Tours, Inc., 708 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …he period when an MCA exemption is in effect a motor carrier is not subject to the Act. In IML Sea Transit, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.Supp. 32 (N.D.Cal.) (three judge panel), aff'd sub nom. Interstate Commerce Commission v. IML Sea Transit, Ltd., 409 U.S. 1002, 93 S.Ct. 433, 34 L.Ed.2d 295 (1972), the issue was whether Sea Transit was a freight forwarder within the Interstate Commerce Act and therefore required to obtain an ICC license. To be subject to ICC regulation, a freight forwarder, inter alia, mus…