WALKER

v.

KENTUCKY

Citator

Cited By

• Constr. Indus. Ass'n OF Sonoma Cnty. v. The City OF Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …s, and such an allegation is sufficient to show that they have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy. See Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y.2d 359, 365-66, 334 N.Y. S.2d 138, 142, 285 N.E. 2d 291, 294, appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1003, 93 S.Ct. 436, 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972). Although appellees have suffered or are threatened with direct personal injury, the “zone of interest” requirement poses a huge stumbling block to their attempt to show standing. The primary federal claim upon…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Steel Hill Dev., Inc. v. Town OF Sanbornton, 469 F.2d 956 (1st Cir. 1972)
  …strict growth on an emergency basis until an adequate study can be made of future needs. 60 Georgetown L.J. 1363 (1972). See also Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y.2d 359, 334 N.Y.S.2d 138, 285 N.E. 2d 291 (1972), appeal dismissed 409 U.S. 1003, 93 S.Ct. 440, 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972). It was evident to the zoning board, and the district court, that haphazard and uncontrolled development of the town’s hill areas would be inimical to present and future Sanbornton residents, see Candlestick Pr…