ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

v.

WICHITA BOARD OF TRADE ET AL.; AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION V. WICHITA BOARD OF TRADE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Atchison v. Wichita Bd. of Trade, 412 U.S. 800 (U.S. 1973)
  …d Mr. Justice Blackmun join. We noted probable jurisdiction in these cases to resolve two important questions relating to the proper role of courts in reviewing approval by the Interstate Commerce Commission of proposed rate increases by railroads. 409 U. S. 1005 (1972). First, under what circumstances may a reviewing court find that the Commission has failed adequately to explain its apparent departure from settled Commission precedent? Because the problem of determining what policies an agency is followin…
• Fontaine v. United States, 411 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1973)
• United States v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss., 412 U.S. 363 (U.S. 1973)
  …he procurement regulations issued by the Secretary of Defense. Nor did it discuss the contention that the markup constituted [*368] an impermissible tax upon federal instrumen-talities. On appeal by the United States, we noted probable jurisdiction, 409 U. S. 1005 (1972).10 For the reasons which follow, we now hold that the District Court erred in concluding that the Twenty-first Amendment provides the State with sufficient authority over liquor transactions to support the application of the Regulation to the…