JOHNNY MANNING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHNNY MANNING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
199 So. 2d 310
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The only question presented by appellant is whether the allegations of appellant’s pro se motion, filed under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, were sufficient to warrant the granting of a plenary hearing. The record reflects that appellant was represented by counsel at all critical stages of the proceeding, including arraignment. Hence the trial court was correct in holding that the appellant is entitled to no relief. Bryant v. State, 174 So.2d 41 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); Sampson v. State, 158 So.2d 771 (D.C.A.Fla.1963).
Affirmed.
LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Aulsbrook v. Burke, 201 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1967)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 199 So. 2d 310.…
Authorities Cited
- Arthur v. Sampson, 158 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Bryant v. State, 174 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)