FELLAND

v.

SCHAEFER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• In re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, Jr., 669 F.2d 779 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …. 679, 9 L.Ed.2d 714 (1963); Bo-ruski v. Stewart, 381 F.Supp. 529 (S.D.N.Y. 1974) (injunction against instituting any further actions based on any matters set forth in the complaint); Ruderer v. United States, 462 F. 2d 897 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1031, 93 S.Ct. 540, 34 L.Ed.2d 482 (1972) and Ruderer v. Department of Justice, 389 F.Supp. 549 (S.D.N.Y.1974) (two courts enjoined same plaintiff from commencing any further actions concerning his discharge from the Army). See also Carter v. Telectron…
• Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States, 775 F.2d 399 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …ourts have the power under 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) to enjoin litigants who abuse the court system by harassing their opponents. See, e.g., Har-relson, 613 F. 2d at 116; Ruderer v. United States, 462 F. 2d 897 (8th Cir.1972) (per curiam), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1031, 93 S.Ct. 540, 34 L.Ed.2d 482 (1972). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing an injunction against further litigation of the matter of plaintiffs’ nonrenewals. As the district court properly noted, appellants’ a…
• Ruderer v. Fines, 614 F.2d 1128 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …noted that, “Appellant has had his day in court; in this day of burgeoning court calendars, he must be restrained if others are to have theirs.” Ruderer v. United States, 462 F. 2d 897, 899 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1031, 93 S.Ct. 540, 34 L.Ed.2d 482 (1972). The appellant has not confined his litigation to the United States district courts and, consequently, other courts have found it necessary to devise means to control his litigiousness. Although the Court of Cla…

  ← 1 / 2 →