BIRDSALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, PETITIONERS,

v.

GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. v. Surette, 281 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1973)
  …and construing opinions have been promulgated by this Court relating to the practice and procedure of all courts and a statutory provision provides a contrary practice or procedure, as in this case, the statute must fall. See, e. g., Biro v. Geiser, 199 So. 2d 461 (Fla.1967). This portion of Fla.Stat. § 455.-06(2), which provides for the severance of a political body’s insurer relates to joinder and severance, truly a procedural matter, and is therefore superseded and rendered ineffective as hereinabove set f…
• Forrest v. Carter, 308 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …case law. (Rule 1.510 RCP; Connell v. Sledge et al., Fla.App., 306 So. 2d 194, opinion filed January 16, 1975; Holl v. Talcott, Sup.Ct.Fla.1966, 191 So. 2d 40; Visingardi v. Tirone, Sup.Ct.Fla.1966, 193 So. 2d 601; Biro v. Geiser, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1967, 199 So. 2d 461; Scanlon v. Litt, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1966, 191 So. 2d 553; Spencer v. Halifax Hospital District, Fla.App.1st 1970, 242 So. 2d 143; Wilson v. State Road Department, Fla.App.1st 1967, 201 So. 2d 619; Campbell v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Fla. App.1972, 265 So. 2…
• Boymer v. Birmelin, 227 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
  …issue created by that affirmative defense, notwithstanding its presentation in the case in the form of a sworn answer, the defendant had the burden of [*362] establishing the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. See Biro v. Geiser, Fla. 1967, 199 So. 2d 461, so holding because of the existence and effect of Rule 1.110(d), RCP, 30 F.S.A. In our view the trial court was in error in holding that the. defendant successfully met that burden, and that want of consideration was established by a preponderance…