RICHARDS

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Johnson v. State, 456 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …s observed by Swink. Accordingly, there was no error in allowing him to so testify in this fashion. See Davis v. United States, 411 F. 2d 1126, 1127-1128'(5th Cir., 1969); United States v. Campbell, 466 F. 2d 529, 531 (9th Cir., 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1062, 93 S.Ct. 571, 34 L.Ed.2d 516 (1972); see also Busby v. United States, 296 F. 2d 328, 332 (9th Cir., 1961). With respect to the second issue, we agree with appellant’s contention that only a single crime occurs when a person at a given time carries…
• United States v. Davis, 546 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …harge of the GSA Data Processing Center in Atlanta. Prior to this litigation, there had not been any requests to view the drawing of the starting number in the clerk’s office. . In United States v. Dalton, 5 Cir., 1972, 465 F. 2d 32, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1062, 93 S.Ct. 570, 34 L.Ed.2d 515, we held, inter alia, that a grand jury selection in which the drawing took place in a room in the clerk’s office where only clerk personnel were present withstood a challenge based on non-public drawing of the jurors’…
• United States v. Levine, 546 F.2d 658 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …e, to provide a common link between these [*663] otherwise unrelated transactions and to demonstrate the existence of a common scheme or plan among the several defendants. See United States v. Banks, 465 F. 2d 1235, 1242-43 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1062, 93 S.Ct. 568, 34 L.Ed.2d 514 (1972). The wording of the count is apt to describe a “wheel conspiracy” in which Harvard at the hub of the wheel might have conspired with Abrams, Levine, and others representing different spokes, in separate transacti…