BOOSTER LODGE NO. 405, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.; AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. BOEING CO. ET AL.
BOOSTER LODGE NO. 405, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.; AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. BOEING CO. ET AL.
409 U.S. 1074
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hall v. Cole, 412 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1973)…e granted certiorari limited to the questions whether (1) an award of attorneys' fees is permissible under § 102 of the LMRDA, and (2) if so, whether such an award under the facts of this case constituted an abuse of the District Court’s discretion. 409 U. S. 1074. We affirm. I Although the traditional American4 rule ordinarily disfavors the allowance of attorneys’ fees in the absence of statutory 5 or contractual authorization,6 federal courts, [*5] in the exercise of their equitable powers, may award att…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co., 412 U.S. 67 (U.S. 1973)…ions to consider “questions relating to the reasonableness of the fines imposed by the Union.” Booster Lodge No. 405, International Association of Machinists v. NLRB, 148 U. S. App. D. C. 119, 137, 459 F. 2d 1143, 1161 (1972). We granted certiorari, 409 U. S. 1074 (1972), and now reverse the judgment below. From May 16,1963, through September 15,1965, Booster Lodge No. 405, International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (the Union), and the Boeing Co. (the Company) were parties to a col…
-
United States v. Pa. Indus. Chem. Corp., 411 U.S. 655 (U.S. 1973)…rt of Appeals set aside PICCO’s conviction and remanded the case to the District Court to give PICCO an opportunity to present the proffered proofs th^t had been disallowed by the District Court. We granted the Government’s petition for certiorari. 409 U. S. 1074 (1972). We agree with the -Court of Appeals that the District Court’s judgment of conviction must be reversed, but we cannot agree with the Court of Appeals’ interpretation of § 13 as foreclosing [*662] prosecution in the absence of the existence of…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence