LONG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RICHARDSON CONTRACTORS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND VAUGHN PAVING COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
DONALD E. BLEAKLEY, APPELLEE
LONG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RICHARDSON CONTRACTORS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND VAUGHN PAVING COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
DONALD E. BLEAKLEY, APPELLEE
199 So. 2d 522
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This, is an appeal by the defendants, Long Construction Company, Inc., Richardson Contractors, Inc. and Vaughn Paving Company, Inc., from a final summary decree of foreclosure of three mortgages on the same property in favor of the plaintiff, Donald E. Bleakley.
The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, all the issues raised and the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find there was no genuine issue of material fact presented to the trial court.
Accordingly, the decree is affirmed.
ANDREWS, Acting C. J., CROSS, J., and MINNET, JAMES F., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reserve Ins. Co. v. Earle W. DAY & Co., 209 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…bing, Inc. v. Maier, Fla.App.1966, 194 So. 2d 666. So long as there exists substantial competent evidence in the record to support him, the trial court’s findings must not be disturbed on appeal. Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 522. The appellant in the instant case has failed to show that the trial court’s findings suffer from a lack of substantial competent evidence to support them. The appellant’s contention concerning the amount of damages has been considered and found to…
-
Bodzo v. Harbour Assocs., Ltd., 219 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)…t a jury. Under such circumstances we are not entitled to substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact. First Atlantic National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 870; Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 522; Leeb v. Read, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 830. WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and GOODING, MARION W, Associate Judge, concur.…
-
S & S Pharms., Inc. v. Hirschfield, 226 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…he amount of the commission, the direct promise or understanding of both appellants to respond to the broker for the amount and, therefore, no error in the entry of the judgment- is demonstrated. Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 522; Lazar v. Orr, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 23; Reserve Insurance Company v. Earle W. Day & Company, Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 709. It is supportable either under the theory that there was a direct promise by the appellants upon the release by the broker…