DAVIS ET AL.

v.

EDWARDS, GOVERNOR OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litig. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp. & Nat'l Union Elec. Corp., 631 F.2d 1069 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …937); Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U.S. 151, 158, 52 S.Ct. 69, 71, 76 L.Ed. 214 (1931); Melancon v. McKeithen, 345 F.Supp. 1025 (E.D.La.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem. 409 U.S. 943, 93 S.Ct. 289, 34 L.Ed.2d 214 (1972), 409 U.S. 1098, 93 S.Ct. 908, 24 L.Ed.2d 679 (1972). Appellees argue that the due process objection to jury trials carries less weight than the preservation of the right to jury trial because it concerns a “hypothetical prospect” of an improper jury verdict and w…
• Mrs. John S. Schexnayder v. Bunge Corp., 508 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …I was not shocked. I disagree with the Jury, but I was not shocked by the verdict. . Melancon v. McKeithen, E.D.La.1972, 345 F.Supp. 1025, aff'd, sub nom. Hill v. McKeithen, 1972, 409 U.S. 943, 93 S.Ct. 290, 34 L.Ed.2d 214; Davis v. Edwards, 1972, 409 U.S. 1098, 93 S.Ct. 908, 34 L.Ed.2d 679.…