HYDE

v.

NELSON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Mediterranean Enters., Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp., 708 F.2d 1458 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …n clause. III. Propriety of the Stay Pending Arbitration We should overturn a trial court’s stay of an action only when we believe the court has abused its discretion. See Filtrol Corp. v. Kelleher, 467 F. 2d 242, 244 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1110, 93 S.Ct. 914, 34 L.Ed.2d 691 (1973). The trial court possesses the inherent power to control its own docket and calendar. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55, 57 S.Ct. 163, 165-66, 81 L.Ed. 153, 158-59 (1936); accord Leyva v. Certifi…
• Weiner v. Shearson, 521 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …, there has been little trouble in finding a discretionary power to abate the second action. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 57 S.Ct. 163, 81 L.Ed. 153 (1936); Filtrol Corporation v. Kelleher, 467 F. 2d 242 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1110, 93 S.Ct. 914, 34 L.Ed.2d 691 (1973). Similarly, where the parallel litigation is pending before a federal administrative agency, we have recognized a discretionary power in the district court to stay its hand. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. National B…
• The Ohio Env't Council v. United States Dist. Court, 565 F.2d 393 (6th Cir. 1977)
  …r way to break the deadlock in which the District Court has placed the plaintiff is apparent. The use of mandamus to review the propriety of a stay of proceeding is well-established, Filtrol Corp. v. Kelleher, 467 F. 2d 242 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1110, 93 S.Ct. 914, 34 L.Ed.2d 691 (1972), and the Second Circuit has recently utilized the writ to order enforcement of an SIP. Friends of the Earth v. Duffy, 552 F. 2d 25 (2d Cir. 1977). The defendant argues that mandamus is not a substitute for appea…