ROSS, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, ET AL.

v.

RADICH

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497 (1st Cir. 1984)
  …as the peyote exemption granted the Native American Church. Marijuana is not covered by the peyote exemption; this in itself distinguishes this case from Kennedy v. Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, 459 F. 2d 415 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1115, 93 S.Ct. 901, 34 L.Ed.2d 699 (1973). Moreover, the peyote exemption is uniquely supported by the legislative history and congressional findings underlying the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, which declares a federal policy of “protectpng] a…
• Gordon H. Mooney, Ltd. v. Farrell Lines, Inc., 616 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …learly [*625] erroneous” standard of Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. Farida, 571 F. 2d 131, 133 (2d Cir. 1978); Director General of India Supply Mission v. S. S. Maru, 459 F. 2d 1370, 1373 n. 3 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1115, 93 S.Ct. 898, 34 L.Ed.2d 699 (1973). On these facts, we have little difficulty in concluding that Maislin was negligent. As a result, Maislin must be held liable along with Export. Under the Car-mack Amendment,9 which governs interstate motor carr…
• Olsen v. Drug Enforcement Administration, 878 F.2d 1458 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
  …82); cf. Kennedy v. Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, 459 F. 2d 415 (9th Cir.1972) (petitioning church not entitled to peyote-use exemption that leaves nonexempt other churches that use peyote in bona fide religious ceremonies), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1115, 93 S.Ct. 901, 34 L.Ed.2d 699 (1973). The DEA would have no warrant to contain the exemption to a single church or religion. See, e.g., Randall v. Wyrick, 441 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Mo.1977) (Aquarian Brotherhood Church); Whyte v. United States, 471 A.…