FERRELL

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Inadi, 475 U.S. 387 (U.S. 1986)
  …(declaration admitted under co-conspirator exemption “automatically satisfies the Sixth Amendment requirements”); United States v. Molt, 758 F. 2d 1198 (CA7 1985) (same); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (CA1 1972) (same), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 1128 (1973). See Mueller, The Federal Coconspirator Exception: Action, Assertion, and Hearsay, 12 Hofstra L. Rev. 323, 361-362, and nn. 131-132 (1984). I realize that this was not the case here. However, the Court’s holding addresses all cases involvin…
• United States v. DeLUNA, 763 F.2d 897 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …. 1005, 102 S.Ct. 1642, 71 L.Ed.2d 874 (1982); United States v. McManus, 560 F. 2d 747, 750 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047, 98 S.Ct. 894, 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973). The declarants who were also co-defendants in the present ease are considered “unavailable” for the purposes of the confrontation clause because they exercised their fifth amendment right and chose not to testi…
• United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …ble confrontation clause infirmities.” See United States v. Perez, 658 F. 2d 654, 660 n.5 (9th Cir. 1981). Cf. United States v. Peacock, 654 F. 2d 339, 349 (5th Cir. 1981); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 271 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973), reh. denied, 410 U.S. 948, 93 S.Ct. 1383, 35 L.Ed.2d 616 (1973). More specifically, this court has remarked: “Although the hearsay rules and the confrontation clause promote similar values, admissibility under…