BROUSSARD

v.

HENDERSON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …ajudicial statements of a co-conspirator who does not take the stand at trial without risk of a reversal for violation of his codefendants’ rights to confrontation. Accord, Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Cox, 449 F. 2d 679, 688-89 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 1783, 32 L.Ed.2d 136 (1972). But see United States v. Kelley, 526 F. 2d 615, 620-21 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denie…
• United States v. Eaglin, 571 F.2d 1069 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …me federal courts have assumed an identity between hearsay and confrontation violations. See, e. g., United States v. Perez, 493 F. 2d 1339, 1342-43 & n.3 (10th Cir. 1974); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Sidman, 470 F. 2d 1158, 1171 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1127, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973). See also United States v. Everidge, 488 F. 2d 1, 2-3 (9th Cir. 1973). But see…
• United States v. Hickey, 596 F.2d 1082 (1st Cir. 1979)
  …therance of a joint venture involving the three robbers. See Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E); Krulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440, 443-44, 69 S.Ct. 716, 93 L.Ed. 790 (1949); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973). Ferreira argues, however, that the joint venture between the three robbers terminated when “Bubba” and Hickey left McDonough’s apartment. We disagree. Whether the joint venture between the three robbers continu…