UNITED STATES

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc., 418 U.S. 602 (U.S. 1974)
  …. Supp. 240 (Conn. 1973), vacated and remanded, post, p. 656; United States v. United Virginia Bankshares, Inc., 347 F. Supp. 891 (ED Va. 1972) ; United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc., 329 F. Supp. 1003 (Colo. 1971), aff’d per curiam, 410 U. S. 577 (1973); United [*628] States v. Idaho First National Bank, 316 F. Supp. 261 (Idaho 1970); United States v. First National Bank of Maryland, 310 F. Supp. 157 (Md. 1970); United States v. First National Bank of Jackson, 301 F. Supp. 1161 (SD Miss. 196…
• Clark v. United Bank OF Denver Nat'l Ass'n, 480 F.2d 235 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …market may eliminate competition in much the same way that a simple horizontal merger can.”5 United States v. First National Baneorporation, Inc., 329 F.Supp. 1003, 1011 (D.C.Colo.1971), aff’d per curiam by an equally divided Court without opinion, 410 U.S. 577, 93 S.Ct. 1434, 35 L.Ed.2d 507 (1973). There appear to be three potential routes of influx into a geographic area by a potential market entrant bank or bank holding company: The first is to establish a bank de novo, that is, create a new bank as a…
• Republic OF Tex. Corp. v. Bd. OF Governors OF the Fed. Reserve Sys., 649 F.2d 1026 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …793, 804 (D.N.J. 1980) (four-firm concentration ratios of 87.7% and 86.4%); and United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc., 329 F.Supp. 1003, 1008 (D.Colo.1971) (three-firm ratio of over 90%), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 410 U.S. 577, 93 S.Ct. 1434, 35 L.Ed.2d 507 (1973). The Mercantile court, however, found a four-firm concentration ratio of 73.8% in the Waco market to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of oligopolistic market performance, relying on 5 P. Areeda & D.…