HOFFMAN ET AL.

v.

CITY OF CINCINNATI

Citator

Cited By

• Burkett v. State, 518 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …statute means a conviction at trial level, rather than one which has become finalized either through the appellate process or through failure to appeal); State v. Anderson, 10 Or.App. 34, 497 P. 2d 1218 (1972), appeal dismissed, Anderson v. Oregon, 410 U.S. 920, 93 S.Ct. 1362, 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973) (arson conviction pending on appeal could be used as the predicate felony); State v. Brown, 6 Or.App. 523, 488 P. 2d 856 (1971), reversed on other grounds, 262 Or. 442, 497 P. 2d 1191 (1972) ("policy considerat…
• Record Revolution NO. 6, Inc. v. The City OF Parma, 638 F.2d 916 (6th Cir. 1980)
  …naturally incorporates this principle of due process, we need not declare the list of logically relevant factors overbroad on its face. City of Cincinnati v. Hoffman, 31 Ohio St.2d 163, 166, 285 N.E. 2d 714 (1972), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 410 U.S. 920, 93 S.Ct. 1370, 35 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973). 2) Offenses Plaintiffs levy two attacks on the definition of the substantive offenses. First, plaintiffs contend that the standard of scienter must be “specific intent” to avoid the problem of vagueness. The…
• United States ex rel. Chester Wojtycha v. Hopkins, 517 F.2d 420 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …r.” Petitioner was charged on two counts, the first on the substantive offense and the second on conspiracy. He was convicted on the substantive allegations only. . New Jersey v. Wojtycha, 62 N.J. 78, 299 A. 2d 76 (1972). . Wojtycha v. New Jersey, 410 U.S. 920, 93 S.Ct. 1371, 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973). . Before the contract was awarded, petitioner had supplied documentation to the county evidencing the sale of his business. The county counsel then issued an opinion stating that the transfer of Mooney was val…