ZATSKY

v.

UNITED STATES; AND LEISNER V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1078, 90 S.Ct. 1528, 25 L.Ed.2d 813 (Blackmun, J.); Mitchell v. Swope, 9 Cir., 1955, 224 F. 2d 365, 367; Sunday v. Madigan, 9 Cir., 1962, 301 F. 2d 871, 873; Broussard v. Patton, 9 Cir., 1972, 466 F. 2d 816, 818, cert. denied, 410 U.S. 942, 93 S.Ct. 1364, 35 L.Ed.2d 609 (1973); Suttles v. Davis, 10 Cir., 1954, 215 F. 2d 760, 761, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 903, 75 S.Ct. 228, 99 L.Ed. 709; Gorko v. Commanding Officer, 10 Cir., 1963, 314 F. 2d 858, 859; Kennedy v. Commandant, 10 Cir., 1967,…
• United States v. O'Neil, 709 F.2d 361 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …. 2d 614 (2d Cir.), cert. [*369] denied, 393 U.S. 977, 89 S.Ct. 444, 21 L.Ed.2d 438 (1968) (transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)). A strikingly similar case to those presently before us is Hilburn v. Butz, 463 F. 2d 1207 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 942, 93 S.Ct. 1359, 35 L.Ed.2d 608 (1973). There the plaintiffs brought suit in the district court seeking a mandamus against the Secretary of Agriculture to require him to remit them sums due under Department of Agriculture programs for the years 1968…
• United States v. Hanigan, 681 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …n of a mistrial is also without merit. Hanigan has not pointed to any material misstatement made by the government upon which he reasonably relied to his detriment. See, e.g., Broussard v. Patton, 466 F. 2d 816, 819-20 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 942, 93 S.Ct. 1364, 35 L.Ed.2d 609 (1973). Moreover, Hanigan does not contend that the district court abused its discretion in declaring the mistrial. See United States v. Cawley, 630 F. 2d 1345, 1349 (9th Cir. 1980); United States v. Berniker, 439 F. 2…