CALIFORNIA ET AL.

v.

LARUE ET AL.; ELLINGBURG V. GOODSON, JUDGE, ET AL.; GERACE ET VIR V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.; HARSH BUILDING CO. ET AL. V. BIALAC ET AL.; SAYLES V. NUNZIO ET AL.; JUDGES, RIGDON V. UNITED STATES; CARR V. TEXAS; CLIZER V. UNITED STATES; SZIJARTO V. NELSON, WARDEN; ARNOLD V. OLIVER, JUDGE; ESCOFIL V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; RITCH ET AL. V. TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT; CHAMPAGNE ET AL. V. PENROD DRILLING CO.; AND OTTOMANO V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …, 658 F. 2d 654, 660 n.5 (9th Cir. 1981). Cf. United States v. Peacock, 654 F. 2d 339, 349 (5th Cir. 1981); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 271 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973), reh. denied, 410 U.S. 948, 93 S.Ct. 1383, 35 L.Ed.2d 616 (1973). More specifically, this court has remarked: “Although the hearsay rules and the confrontation clause promote similar values, admissibility under a hearsay exception does not a fortiori dissolve the court’s obl…
• United States v. Ordonez, 737 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …n, it is per se admissible without violating the Confrontation Clause.” Among the cases cited for this principle is Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260, reh. denied, 410 U.S. 948, 93 S.Ct. 1383, 35 L.Ed.2d 616 (1973). This court expressly refused to adopt the Ottomano rule in United States v. Snow, 521 F. 2d 730, 734 n. 2 (9th Cir.1975) and in United States v. Perez, 658 F. 2d 654, 660 n. 5 (9th Cir.1981). The rule followed…
• United States v. Wilmer Stanley Snow, 521 F.2d 730 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …exception automatically satisfies the Confrontation Clause. The First Circuit has found such automatic compliance. Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260, reh. denied, 410 U.S. 948, 93 S.Ct. 1383, 35 L.Ed.2d 616 (1973). There is a suggestion of this rule in at least one decision of this circuit. United States v. Everidge, 488 F. 2d 1 (9th Cir. 1973). However, we reaffirm the fact that Baxter correctly states the rule in this c…