THOMPSON

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Allen G. Charles, M.D. v. Carey, 627 F.2d 772 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …and is entitled to the right to life from conception. . According to the plaintiffs, a statute enacted with such an unlawful purpose must be stricken in its entirety. See, e. g., Doe v. Rampton, 366 F.Supp. 189 (D.Utah 1973), vacated and remanded, 410 U.S. 950, 35 L.Ed.2d 683. We, however, do not agree with the plaintiffs that the preamble, when read as a whole, expresses an unlawful purpose. The preamble says that [I]t is the intention of the General Assembly to reasonably regulate abortion in conforman…
• Friendship Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. The Chicago Bd. OF Health, 505 F.2d 1141 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …of a continuing nature, with potentially very real criminal consequences is sufficient to allow plaintiffs to assert the rights of their patients. Doe v. Scott, 321 F.Supp. 1385, 1387-1388 (N.D.Ill.1971) (three-judge court) vacated on other grounds, 410 U.S. 950, 93 S.Ct. 1423, 35 L.Ed.2d 683 (1973); Crossen v. Breckenridge, 446 F. 2d 833, 839-840 (6th Cir. 1971). Griswold and Eisenstadt are based in part on the type of relationship that existed between the plaintiff and the individual whose rights he is s…