CHEANEY, AKA OWENS

v.

INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Rasmussen Drilling, Inc. v. Kerr-McGEE Nuclear Corp. & Kerr-McGee Corp., 571 F.2d 1144 (10th Cir. 1978)
  …o. v. Emerson, 208 U.S. 25, 28 S.Ct. 196, 52 L.Ed. 374 (1908); Western Standard Uranium v. Thurston, 355 P. 2d 377 (Wyo.1960); Columbia Standard Corporation v. Ranchers Exploration and Development, Inc., 468 F. 2d 547 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 991, 93 S.Ct. 1506, 36 L.Ed.2d 190 (1973). In Columbia Standard, supra, we observed that a locator must make a “good faith” entry and that although a prior locator’s location notices of record were defective still the subsequent locator who discovered…
• Boykins v. Louie L. Wainwright, 737 F.2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …0, 97 S.Ct. 139, 50 L.Ed.2d 124 (1976). Moreover, states deserve wide latitude to fashion their own evidentiary rules. Maness v. Wainwright, 512 F. 2d 88, 92 (5th Cir.1975); Bassett v. Smith, 464 [*1544] F. 2d 347, 351 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 991, 93 S.Ct. 1509, 36 L.Ed.2d 190 (1973). Nevertheless, when a state trial court’s evidence rulings deny a habeas petitioner fundamental constitutional protections, this Court’s duty requires it to enforce the constitution’s guarantees by granting the…
• Haitian Refugee Ctr. v. Gracey, 809 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …r own — the right not to be injured by ultra vires executive action. See Air Reduction Co. v. Hickel, 420 F. 2d 592 (D.C.Cir.1969). . Viewing third party standing as implied by specific constitutional guarantees readily explains Cheaney v. Indiana, 410 U.S. 991, 93 S.Ct. 1516, 36 L.Ed.2d 189 (1973), a case summarily denying a nonphysician, convicted of performing an abortion, standing to assert his patent's rights. Because the Roe right does not protect nonphysician-patient relationships, there was no basi…