TONASKET

v.

WASHINGTON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bundy v. State, 455 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1984)
  …cture was included in the array of ten photographs did not render the procedure impermissibly suggestive. State v. Colby, 361 A. 2d 256 (Me.1976); Commonwealth v. Bumpus, 362 Mass. 672, 290 N.E. 2d 167 (1972), vacated on other grounds, 411 U.S. 945, 93 S.Ct. 1941, 36 L.Ed.2d 407 (1973); State v. Davis, 25 N.C. App. 256, 212 S.E. 2d 680 (1975); Drewry v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 186, 191 S.E. 2d 178 (1972); Fells v. State, 65 Wis.2d 525, 223 N.W. 2d 507 (1974). See also Annot., 39 A.L.R.3d 1000 (1971 & Supp.19…
• Bryan v. Itasca Cnty., 426 U.S. 373 (U.S. 1976)
  …of Hearings on H. R. 1063 before the Subcommittee on Indian Affairs of the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. (1953). The transcript was produced by the United States during the briefing of Tonasket v. Washington, 411 U. S. 451 (1973). The portion quoted in the text is reproduced in the Appendix in the instant case. Cf. Israel & Smithson, supra, n. 8, at 296: “A fair reading of these two clauses suggests that Congress never intended 'civil laws’ to mean the entire array…
• Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation, 439 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1979)
  …ong., 1st Sess. (July 15, 1953) (hereinafter cited as June 29 Hearings and July 15 Hearings, respectively). The transcripts of these hearings were first made available to this Court by the United States during the briefing of Tonasket v. Washington, 411 U. S. 451. They were again supplied in Bryan v. Itasca County, supra, and for this appeal have been reproduced in full in the Appendix to Brief for Appellee. These hearings, along with the House Report on H. R. 1063 as amended, H. R. Rep. No. 848, supra, and…