WORTON
v.
OKLAHOMA
WORTON
OKLAHOMA
411 U.S. 910
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cont'l Cablevision OF Ohio, Inc. v. Am. Elec. Power Co., 715 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir. 1983)…There is no credible dispute that defendants enjoy a lawful, natural monopoly over the relevant product and geographic [*1121] markets. See Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366, 369, 93 S.Ct. 1022, 1025, 35 L.Ed.2d 359, reh’g denied, 411 U.S. 910, 93 S.Ct. 1523, 36 L.Ed.2d 201 (1973); Byars I, supra, 609 F. 2d at 853 n. 27. Therefore, our inquiry is limited to whether defendants abused their lawfully acquired monopoly power by engaging in some type of anticompetitive conduct. See generally B…