DADE CANVAS PRODUCTS CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

BEN D. EWING AND CEIL B. EWING, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Dias v. State, 812 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …added). The question of self-defense is one of fact, and is one for the jury to decide where the facts are disputed. See Scholl v. State, 94 Fla. 1138, 115 So. 43, 44 (1927); Reimel v. State, 532 So. 2d 16, 18 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Payton v. State, 200 So. 2d 255, 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). In discussing the question of the reasonableness of the force used, the court in Reimel stated: A jury question is presented when the evidence is reasonably susceptible of two views, either that the defendant’s action in sh…
• Darling v. State, 81 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
  …State, 74 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that possession of a firearm by a convicted felon qualifies as an unlawful activity within the “stand your ground” law). The question of self defense is ordinarily one for the jury. Payton v. State, 200 So. 2d 255, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); see also [*579] Liotta v. State, 939 So. 2d 338, 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). In this case, the trial court determined that evidence of Darling’s convicted-felon status was admissible so that the jury could properly evaluate wh…
• Bristow v. State, 338 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …ense were properly presented by the trial court to the jury for its determination. Evaluation of testimony concerning self-defense is the function of the trier of fact. See Turner v. State, 298 So. 2d 559 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). See also Payton v. State, 200 So. 2d 255 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), where the court held that ordinarily the question of self-defense is one of fact to be determined by the trier of fact.2 The second point that we shall address ourselves to is that concerning the alleged error of the trial court…

Authorities Cited

• Hedwig Meyer v. Faust, 83 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1955)
• Yafanaro v. Ninos, 123 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)