RUDMAN

v.

STONE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (U.S. 1978)
  …e curative instructions have been found sufficient to dispel any prejudice. See, e. g., United States v. Bloom, 538 F. 2d 704, 710 (CA5 1976); id., at 711 (Tuttle, J., concurring); United States v. Plante, 472 F. 2d 829, 831-832 (CA1), cert. denied, 411 U. S. 950 (1973); United States v. Roland, 449 F. 2d 1281 (CA5 1971); Driver v. United States, 441 F. 2d 276 (CA5 1971); Beasley v. United States, 94 U. S. App. D. C. 406, 218 F. 2d 366 (1954), cert. denied, 349 U. S. 907 (1955). See also United States v. Hof…
• United States v. Bosch, 584 F.2d 1113 (1st Cir. 1978)
  …was only referred to once, and then briefly, we find that the district court’s decision to allow that reference to remain in evidence does not constitute reversible error.2 See United States v. Plante, 472 F. 2d 829, 830-32 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 950, 93 S.Ct. 1932, 36 L.Ed.2d 411 (1973). Any prejudice which may have been caused by the volunteered statement concerning the gunshot wound was effectively cured by the court’s immediate and comprehensive instructions to the jury to disregard that ev…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Splain, 545 F.2d 1131 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ich could have flowed from this evidence could have been cured by the refused cautionary instruction that the District Court offered to give. United States v. Scott, supra, at 20; United States v. Plante, 472 F. 2d 829, 831 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 950, 93 S.Ct. 1932, 36 L.Ed.2d 411 (1973). Counsel for Splain rejected the instruction and Splain can not now complain that the evidence may have prejudiced the jury. A cautionary instruction here would have erased any possible prejudice. The trial judg…