FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

v.

NEW ENGLAND POWER CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1974)
  …F. Supp. 848, 862 (1973).6 We postponed [*366] consideration of the question of jurisdiction in light of § 211 (a) to the hearing on the merits, and set the case for oral argument with No. 72-700, Hernandez v. Veterans’ Administration, post, p. 391. 411 U. S. 981 (1973).7 We hold, in agreement with the District Court, that § 211 (a) is inapplicable to this action and therefore that appellants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter was properly denied. On the merits, we agree that a…
• Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1974)
  …ts of Louisiana refused’to disturb the rulings of the trial court, the Supreme Court of Louisiana expressly rejecting petitioner’s due process claims pressed under the Federal Constitution. 263 La. 627, 269 So. 2d. 186 (1972). We.granted certiorari, 411 U. S. 981 (1973), and now .affirm the judgment of the Louisiana Supreme Court. Petitioner’s basic proposition is that because he had possession of and a substantial interest in the sequestered' property, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment nec…
• Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Nat'l Ass'n of R.R. Passengers, 414 U.S. 453 (U.S. 1974)
  …spondent has standing and that § 307 does not otherwise bar such a suit by a private party who is allegedly aggrieved.4 We granted certiorari to decide whether such a private cause of action can be maintained in light of § 307 (a) of the Amtrak Act. 411 U. S. 981 (1973). In this Court and in the Court of Appeals, the parties have approached the question from several perspectives. The issue has been variously stated to be whether the Amtrak Act can be read to create a private right of action to enforce compl…