UNITED NEW YORK SANDY HOOK PILOTS ASSN. ET AL.

v.

DENT, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Meeks v. State, 382 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 1980)
  …he burden is on the person seeking collateral relief to specifically allege and establish the grounds for relief and to establish whether these grounds resulted in prejudice to that person. Foxworth v. State, 267 So. 2d 647 (Fla.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 987, 93 S.Ct. 2276, 36 L.Ed.2d 965 (1973). Second, the appropriate test to be applied in determining whether defendant was afforded effective assistance of counsel is not “sham and mockery,” but whether counsel was reasonably- likely to render and did r…
• Hall v. State, 403 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1981)
  …ot actually or constructively present at the commission of such offense. An aider and abettor is responsible for all acts committed by his accomplice in furtherance of the criminal scheme. Foxworth v. State, 267 So. 2d 647 (Fla.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 987, 93 S.Ct. 2276, 36 L.Ed.2d 965 (1973); Pope v. State, 84 Fla. 428, 94 So. 865 (1922). The evidence in this case shows that either Hall or Ruffin killed Mrs. Hurst. It also demonstrates that the other was an aider and abettor. There is sufficient evi…
• Hall v. State, 403 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1981)
  …and the fact that the state did not prove which of the two fired on Coburn does not necessitate either’s acquittal. By actively operating together each was guilty of the acts of the other. Foxworth v. State, 267 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 987, 93 S.Ct. 2276, 36 L.Ed.2d 965 (1973); Pope v. State, 84 Fla. 428, 94 So. 865 (1922). The evidence clearly demonstrates the guilt of each for Coburn’s death. Although it is clear that one of the men shot Coburn, the evidence presented is not suffi…