GIANT OF MARYLAND, INC.

v.

STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Orozco, 590 F.2d 789 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …(1971); Coplen, 541 F. 2d at 215; People v. Dumas, 9 Cal.3d 871, 882-85, 109 Cal.Rptr. 304, 311-13, 512 P. 2d 1208, 1215-17 (1973); People v. Laursen, 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-02, 104 Cal.Rptr. 425, 430-31, 501 P. 2d 1145, 1150-51 (1972), appeal dismissed, 412 U.S. 915, 93 S.Ct. 2738, 37 L.Ed.2d 142 (1973). We are persuaded that such circumstances existed here. The vehicle could easily have been moved and the contents hidden or destroyed. These factors justify a warrant-less search. See Coplen, 541 F. 2d at 215;…
• United States v. Erlinda Grajeda, 587 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …vidence which would aid in conviction of the misdemeanor. See Wimberly v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.3d 557, 128 Cal.Rptr. 641, 547 P. 2d 417, 423 (1976); People v. Laursen, 8 Cal.3d 192, 104 Cal.Rptr. 425, 501 P. 2d 1145, 1151 (1972), appeal dismissed, 412 U.S. 915, 93 S.Ct. 2738, 37 L.Ed.2d 142 (1973); People v. Burke, 61 Cal.2d 575, 39 Cal.Rptr. 531, 394 P. 2d 67, 70 (1964). The search did not violate California law. Applying the federal standard we similarly conclude that the officer had probable cause to…