GOODING

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (81 total)

• Jones v. Diamond, 519 F.2d 1090 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …from the class action order independent of section 1292(b), we must dismiss the appeal for lack of a final judgment. See Ballas v. Symm, 5 Cir. 1974, 494 F. 2d 1167, 1169; Graci v. United States, 5 Cir. 1973, 472 F. 2d 124, 126, cert. denied, 1973, 412 U.S. 928, 93 S.Ct. 2752, 37 L.Ed.2d 155. Cf. Dunlop v. Ledet’s Foodliner of Larose, Inc., 5 Cir. 1975, 509 F. 2d 1387; Barfield v. Weinberger, 5 Cir. 1973, 485 F. 2d 696. [*1095] I. Appealability of Order Denying Class Action As a general rule, an order den…
• United States v. Ashdown, 509 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …it began outside the limitations period it ended well within it. It is proper for the jury to infer one conspiracy starting before and ending after the statute of limitations period. United States v. Seuss, 1 Cir. 1973, 474 F. 2d 385, cert. denied, 412 U.S. 928, 93 S.Ct. 2751, 37 L.Ed.2d 155. Under similar circumstances, the Tenth Circuit found no statutory bar. In that case, a six-count mail fraud, the defendant made fraudulent representations in advertising letters and circulars. As in this case, the cou…
• United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …e Hoffman Estates zoning, his travel was incidental to the bribery. However, section 1952 does not require that defendant’s travel be solely in pursuit of criminal activity, United States v. Gooding, 473 F. 2d 425, 428 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 928, 93 S.Ct. 2752, 37 L.Ed.2d 155, and since Stulberg traveled to participate in the rezoning scheme, it cannot seriously be contended that his travel was incidental. Stulberg attended the meeting of the village Board October 24, at which the trustees…