ROSS ET AL.

v.

BROWN TITLE CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Assure Competitive Transp., Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 629 F.2d 467 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …(1970) . . Inv. Co. Inst. v. Bd. of Gov. of Federal Reserve Sys., 551 F. 2d 1270, 1279-80 (D.C. Cir.1977) (additional citations omitted). See also REA Express, Inc. v. Alabama Great Southern R. R. Co., 343 F.Supp. 851, 856 (S.D.N.Y.1972), affirmed, 412 U.S. 934, 93 S. Ct. 2774, 37 L.Ed.2d 333 (1973). In this case Congress has provided with particularity that challenges to orders of the Commission are to be brought in the court of appeals. As the Commission notes, if the district court could exercise jurisd…
• Parks v. "MR. Ford", 556 F.2d 132 (3d Cir. 1977)
  …couraging the repairman’s service business by allowing him to retain possession of a chattel on which he has worked until he is paid, is sufficient to justify the retention lien. Cf. Ross v. Brown Title Gorp., 356 F.Supp. 595 (E.D. La.), aff’d mem., 412 U.S. 934, 93 S.Ct. 2788, 37 L.Ed.2d 394 (1973); Spielman-Ford, Inc. v. Hanson’s Inc., 379 F.Supp. 997 (D.Ariz. 1973), aff’d mem., 417 U.S. 901, 94 S.Ct. 2596, 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974). Hernandez v. European Auto Collision, Inc., supra; Mason v. Garris, supra; a…
• REA Express, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 568 F.2d 940 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …69. In that year the participating railroads, which were dissatisfied with Railway Express’ continuous losses, extricated themselves from its ownership. REA Express, Inc. v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co., 343 F.Supp. 851 (S.D.N.Y.1972), aff’d, 412 U.S. 934 (1973). REA, the bankrupt herein, emerged as an independent company which carried on the business of Railway Express. Upon the organization of REA in 1969, it provided express service with a routing system significantly different from the railroad…