SENDAK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA

v.

DILLIN, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1974)
  …67 F. 2d 226 (1972), cert. denied, 411 U. S. 921 (1973), we granted the petition for certiorari filed by petitioner Joel Edelman, who is the present Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid, and successor to the former directors sued below. 412 U. S. 937 (1973). The petition for certiorari raised the same contentions urged by the petitioner in the Court of Appeals.7 Because we believe the Court of Appeals [*659] erred in its disposition of the Eleventh Amendment claim, we reverse that portion of the…
• Bradley v. Sch. Bd. of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 (U.S. 1974)
  …and attorneys’ fees for services rendered from March 10, 1970, to January 29, 1971. 53 F. R. D. 28 (ED Va. 1971). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, one judge dissenting, reversed. 472 F. 2d 318 (1972). We granted certiorari, 412 U. S. 937 (1973), to determine whether the allowance of attorneys’ fees [*699] was proper. Pertinent to the resolution of the issue is the enactment in 1972 of § 718 of Title VII, the Emergency School Aid Act, 20 U. S. C. § 1617 (1970 ed., Supp. II), as part…
• Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189 (U.S. 1974)
  …s so as to eliminate any question of its constitutionality. In view of the importance of the jury trial issue in the administration and enforcement of Title VIII and the diversity of views in the lower courts on the question,2 we granted certiorari, 412 U. S. 937 (1973).3 We affirm. The legislative history on the jury trial question is sparse, and what little is available is ambiguous. There seems to be some indication that supporters of Title VIII were concerned that the possibility of racial prejudice on…