GULF STATES UTILITIES CO.

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; DELONG CORP. ET AL. V. OREGON, BY AND THROUGH STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION; ESSEX, ADMINISTRATRIX V. WALTERS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.; GAY V. UNITED STATES; LUCAS V. WYOMING ET AL.; RANDO V. ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; WALTERS V. WALTERS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; MORRIS V. SPARROW ET AL.; GERMAN V. FLORIDA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Tarver v. State, 371 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
  …st be a single individual in order for his or her needs to be included in calculating the amount of the AFDC grant.” (emphasis supplied) The same result was reached in two other cases, Rodriguez v. Vowell, 472 F. 2d 622 (5th Cir. 1973) cert. denied 412 U.S. 944, 93 S.Ct. 2777, 37 L.Ed.2d 404; and Reyna v. Vowell, 470 F. 2d 494 (5th Cir. 1972) where the court clearly held that a parent’s needs are to be considered in determining eligibility: “The plain language of the Social Security Act, its legislative h…
• Ala. Nursing Home Ass'n v. Harris, 617 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …program. However, once it has voluntarily elected to participate in the program, the state must comply with federal standards. Florida v. Matthews, 526 F. 2d 319, 326 (5th Cir. 1976); Rodriguez v. Vowell, 472 F. 2d 622, 624 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 944, 93 S.Ct. 2777, 37 L.Ed.2d 404 (1973); Reyna v. Vowell, 470 F. 2d 494, 496 (5th Cir. 1972). Inadequate state appropriations do not excuse noncompliance. A state may not circumvent its previous guarantee of reasonable cost related reimbursement by fa…
• Nonnie Mae Norman v. ST. Clair, 610 F.2d 1228 (5th Cir. 1980)