ROMANUS ET AL.
v.
CALIFORNIA; GOWER V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1973-06-25
Nos. 71-1353; No. 71-6287
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment in each case. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would grant certiorari, vacate the judgments, and remand cases for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.
413 U.S. 914 Supreme Court of the United States (1973) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miller v. United States, 422 U.S. 1024 (U.S. 1975)
    …on in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973). 413 U. S. 913 (1973). On remand, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit again affirmed the convictions. 505 F. 2d 1247. For the reasons stated in my dissent from the remand of this case, 413 U. S. 914, and because the present judgment was rendered-after Miller, I would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment.* * Although four of us would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the cas…
  • Miller v. United States, 422 U.S. 1025 (U.S. 1975)
    …on in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973). 413 U. S. 913 (1973). On remand, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit again affirmed the convictions. 507 F. 2d 1100. For the reasons stated in my dissent from the remand of this case, 413 U. S. 914, and because the present judgment was rendered after Miller, I would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment.* * Although four of us would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the cas…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw