SATIACUM
v.
WASHINGTON

U.S. | 1973-10-15
No. 72-552
414 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States (1973) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 38 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 94 S. Ct. 209 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 163 · SCDB 1973-001
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

It appearing that petitioner might have been fishing at a location outside the boundaries of what is, or was, the Puyallup Indian Reservation when the acts with which he is charged were committed, and, if this were so, that the Supreme Court of Washington then unnecessarily addressed, and determined, the federal question whether the Puyallup Reservation “has ceased to exist,” the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for resolution by the state courts of the factual issue whether the alleged offenses took place outside the boundaries of what is, or was, the Reservation.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Moses v. Kinnear, 490 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1973)
    …the Puyallup Indian Reservation when the alleged offenses were committed, and if so, the Supreme Court of Washington had unnecessarily addressed and determined “the federal question whether the Puyallup Reserva [*28] tion ‘has ceased to exist’ ”.15 414 U.S. 1, 94 S.Ct. 209, 38 L.Ed.2d 1. On January 29, 1973 the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, in United States of America v. The State of Washington, an action involving the enforcement of fishing laws, held that the Puy…
  • Refrigerated Transp. Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & The United States, 686 F.2d 881 (11th Cir. 1982)
    …tion of a requirement for extended service at those points for which testimony is not available.” Miller Transporters, Inc., 594 F. 2d at 466 (quoting American Trucking Association, Inc. v. United States, 373 F.Supp. 252, 256 (W.D.Tex.), aff’d mem., 414 U.S. 1.105, 94 S.Ct. 832, 38 L.Ed.2d 734 (1973)). The Commission could infer from an unrebutted showing of representative need that the need extended beyond the localities for which evidence was offered. Refrigerated Transport Co., Inc., 616 F. 2d at 754.…
  • United States v. State OF Wash., 496 F.2d 620 (9th Cir. 1974)
    …uyallup Indian Reservation1 and, as a consequence, the right of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians to fish, free from state interference, on that part of the Puyallup River lying within the Reservation. This is a federal question, Satiacum v. Washington, 414 U.S. 1, 94 S.Ct. 209, 38 L.Ed.2d 1 (1973); which was left open in Puyallup Tribe v. Dept. of Game, 391 U.S. 392, 394, n. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1725, 20 L.Ed.2d 689 (1968), and Moses v. Kinnear, 490 F. 2d 21, 27-28 (CA 9 1974). After a careful study, we can find no…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw