PENDARVIS CHEVROLET, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
LESLIE M. STEELE ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1967-07-12
No. 36410
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
200 So. 2d 531 Florida Supreme Court (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
• PER CURIAM.

• PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 23, 1967.

We find that oral'argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs leads us to conclude that *532there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Attorney’s fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Steele v. Pendarvis Chevrolet, Inc., 220 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1969)
    …nment is proper under the peculiar facts of this case and under the holding of the Evans decision, but we feel that in all fairness, the matter should be reconsidered.” This Court denied the employer’s petition for certiorari without oral argument, 200 So. 2d 531. On remand, Industrial Judge Whitmore conducted further hearings on September 7, 1967, to re-examine his first order in the light of the then recent decisions of Evans v. F. I. C., supra, and Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., supra. He undertook…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw