SCARPA

v.

UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1979)
  …ole determinations conflicts with decisions of other Courts of Appeals, see, e. g., Brown v. Lundgren, 528 F. 2d 1050 (CA5), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 917 (1976); Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 477 F. 2d 278 (CA5) (en banc), vacated as moot, 414 U. S. 809 (1973); Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board, No. 74-1899 (CA6 Jan. 15, 1975), vacated and remanded to consider mootness, 429 U. S. 60 (1976). See also Franklin v. Shields, 569 F. 2d 784, 800 (CA4 1977), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 1003 (1978); United States…
• United States ex rel. Thomas Johnson v. Chairman OF NEW York State Bd. OF Parole & Comm'r of N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. Servs., 500 F.2d 925 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …rief statement of the grounds for denial,” 5 U.S.C. § 555(e) (1970), rather than on due process. However, contrary to the position of the Fifth Circuit in Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 477 F. 2d 278 (5th Cir.) (en banc), vacated as moot, 414 U.S. 809, 94 S.Ct. 79, 38 L.Ed.2d 44 (1973), which the dissent relies on, the court also recognized that “a substantial argument can be made that some modicum of due process should attend the denial of the expectation of conditional freedom on parole inasmuc…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• Brown v. Lundgren, 528 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …U.S. 147, 96 S.Ct. 347, 46 L.Ed.2d 350, the court declined to follow the reasoning expressed by this court in the en banc decision in Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 5 Cir., 1973, 477 F. 2d 278, vacated for consideration of mootness, 1973, 414 U.S. 809, 94 S.Ct. 79, 38 L.Ed.2d 44, dismissed as moot, 5 Cir., 1973, 501 F. 2d 992. . 5 U.S.C.A. § 703 provides, in pertinent part: The form of proceeding for judicial review is the special statutory review proceeding relevant to the subject matter in a c…

  ← 1 / 2 →