RUBY LEE GOINGS, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
RUBY LEE GOINGS, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
200 So. 2d 537
Florida Supreme Court (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 1, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clayton v. Lease-Way Transp. Corp. and/or Tropical Transp., Inc., 236 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 1970)…overturning and setting aside these findings unless there was no competent substantial evidence in the record to support the same. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Fla.1951, 55 So. 2d 741; Wright v. Coral Farms et al., Fla. 1967, 200 So. 2d 537; Sun Insurance Company v. Boyd, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 419; Shunk v. Gulf American Land Corp., Fla. 1969, 224 So. 2d 269. We have carefully read the record herein and, although we might have reached different conclusions than did the trial judge…