HENNINGER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …ighed any prejudice. . See note 192 supra for the more complete colloquy. . If a requested instruction is in any respect incorrect, the denial of such a request is not error. United States v. Billingsley, 474 F. 2d 63, 65 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 819, 94 S.Ct. 42, 38 L.Ed.2d 51 (1973); United States v. Kelly, 349 F. 2d 720, 759-760 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947, 86 S.Ct. 1467, 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); Grandsinger v. United States, 332 F. 2d 80, 82 (10th Cir. 1964); Carbo v. United Sta…
• Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …ir. 1975); George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc., 508 F. 2d 547, 550 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1004, 95 S.Ct. 2407, 44 L.Ed.2d 673; Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc., 471 F. 2d 149, 161-64 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 819, 94 S.Ct. 43, 38 L.Ed.2d 51 (1973); Cooper, Attempts and Monopolization: A Mildly Expansionary Answer to the Prophylactic Riddle of Section Two, 72 Mich.L.Rev. 373, 385 & n.37 (1974). Indeed, one commentator has concluded that the Lessig approach “r…
• Paulina Castillo v. Ercell Givens, 704 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …endent contractor, this Court could conclude that Tonche was a joint employer with the defendant; in this instance, the field workers would still be employees of the defendant. Hodgson v. Griffin & Brand, 471 F. 2d 235, 237 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 819, 94 S.Ct. 43, 38 L.Ed.2d 51 (1973). In this hypothetical situation, the Court could, of course, con-elude that Tonche was not a joint employer with the defendant. Since this Court concludes that Tonche was an employee of defendant, we do not exami…

  ← 1 / 2 →