WILLIAMS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• State v. Thewell Eugene Hamilton, 574 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1991)
  …cted the verdict. Id. Later, the district court conducted the hearing and concluded there was no reasonable possibility of prejudice. The Fifth Circuit then affirmed. Rodriguez y Paz v. United States, 473 F. 2d 662, 663-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 820, 94 S.Ct. 115, 38 L.Ed.2d 52 (1973). Although the Paz court did not directly address the issue, the Fifth Circuit later determined that the burden of proof rests with the government, under a harmless error analysis. Accord L. Hardwick & B. Ware, Ju…
• Flanagan v. State, 586 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …ulted the material” persuades us and we hold that there was no reasonable possibility that the video cassette in the jury room affected the jury’s verdict in this case. Di [*1092] Guilio; Paz v. United States, 473 F. 2d 662 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 820, 94 S.Ct. 115, 38 L.Ed.2d 52 (1973); United States v. Howard, 506 F. 2d 865 (5th Cir. 1975). Flanagan next argues that the trial court erred in admitting so-called Williams Rule testimony of an incident of sexual abuse committed by appellant on the…
• Powell v. Allstate Ins. Co., 652 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 1995)
  …by this Court and our appellate courts in a wide variety of cases. In State v. Hamilton, 574 So. 2d 124 (Fla.1991), we adopted the test used by the Fifth Circuit in Rodriguez Y. Paz v. United States, 473 F. 2d 662, 663-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 820, 94 S.Ct. 115, 38 L.Ed.2d 52 (1973), and United States v. Howard, 506 F. 2d 865, 869 (5th Cir.1975), which limits the trial court’s inquiry in jury misconduct cases to objective demonstration of extrinsic factual matter disclosed in the jury room. H…