BRIGHAM ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Fogarty, 692 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1982)
  …ort, sell, or possess marijuana, the legislative classification complained of here must be upheld unless it bears no rational relationship to a legitimate government purpose. United States v. Kiffer, 477 F. 2d 349, 352 (2nd Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 831, 94 S.Ct. 165, 38 L.Ed.2d 65 (1973). Accordingly, “the judiciary may not sit as a superlegislature to judge the wisdom or desirability of legislative policy determinations made in areas that neither affect fundamental rights nor proceed along suspe…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …he medical use of marijuana or the drug’s potential for abuse should result in a reclassification of marijuana is a matter for legislative or administrative, not judicial, judgment. See United States v. Kiffer, 477 F. 2d 349 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 831, 94 S.Ct. 62, 38 L.Ed.2d 65 (1973); United States v. LaFroscia, 354 F.Supp. 1338 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 485 F. 2d 457 (2d Cir. 1973). The Act contains a mechanism by which evidence such as that on which the defendant relies may be presented to the atto…
• United States v. Horsley, 519 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …es raised by appellants, the Second Circuit also rejected the arguments, noting that “there is no colorable claim of a fundamental constitutional right to sell marihuana . . ." United States v. Kiffer, 2 Cir., 1973, 477 F. 2d 349, 352, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 831, 94 S.Ct. 165, 38 L.Ed.2d 65. The Kiffer court pointed out that Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 486, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965) and Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 89 S.Ct. 1243, 22 L.Ed.2d 542 (1969), relied upon by appellants, are no…