COCHRAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• United States v. Blasco, 702 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …s entry and search of residence upheld where officers were in “hot pursuit” of armed robbery suspect); United States v. Kreimes, 649 F. 2d 1185 (5th Cir. 1981) (“hot pursuit” exception); United States v. Rubin, 474 F. 2d 262 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 833, 94 S.Ct. 173, 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973) (risk of removal or destruction of narcotics from statute justified warrantless entry and search). See 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure §)6.5 (1978). Because the protections of the fourth amendment are crucial…
• United States v. McMILLAN, 508 F.2d 101 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …that the determination of the qualifications of an expert is a matter left to the discretion of the trial court. E. g., United States v. Burden, 497 F. 2d 385 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. Cochran, 475 F. 2d 1080, 1084 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 833, 94 S.Ct. 173, 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973); White v. United States, 399 F. 2d 813, 819 (8th Cir. 1968). See generally McCormick, Evidence § 13 at 30 (Cleary ed. 1972). Gaston is a forensic chemist with the Drug Enforcement Administration. After examining t…
• United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …rtment, especially since they did not know how many means of ingress there might be. While such circumstances probably would have justified the agents’ entry into Miller’s apartment, see United States v. Rubin, 474 F. 2d 262 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 833, 94 S.Ct. 173, 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973), they would have authorized no more than a quick security check of the premises to make sure no person was present, and a posting of guards to be sure no person entered, to destroy evidence before authorization to…