KOSKY

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• United States v. Oates, 560 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …nded only to point out that, in an unsettled and evolving area of the law appellant’s constitutional argument raises sufficiently substantial and difficult questions, see, e.g., United States v. Puco, 476 F. 2d 1099,1103 n.6 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844, 94 S.Ct. 106, 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973); United States v. Bell, supra at 670; United States v. Yates, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 308, 524 F. 2d 1282, 1286 n.10 (D.C.Cir.1975), to persuade us that this case is best decided on narrow statutory grounds. Such a decis…
• United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …of a satisfactory basis for evaluating the reliability of his extrajudicial declarations used against them. Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 89, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970); United States v. Puco, 476 F. 2d 1099, 1103 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844, 94 S.Ct. 106, 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973). We disagree. We believe that, implicit in the result reached by the Court as a whole in Dutton, and in the language of Justice Stewart’s plurality opinion, is the conclusion that the confrontation clause present…
• United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …ications.11 Fleishman obviously did not believe Agents Needham, Delisse and Hobdy were DEA agents so as to be motivated to lie to them. See United States v. Snow, 521 F. 2d at 735; United States v. Puco, 476 F. 2d 1099, 1104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844, 94 S.Ct. 106, 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973). In addition, the repeated statements regarding Fleishman’s people were corroborated by Fleishman’s phone calls, writing down the number where his cohorts could be reached, his repeated attempts to reach them only…