SHERMAN

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Milan Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …rejudicial political and religious matters. We have repeatedly held that the Government is ordinarily permitted to respond to arguments impugning the integrity of its case, e.g., United States v. Miller, 478 F. 2d 1315, 1318 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 851, 94 S.Ct. 144, 38 L.Ed.2d 100 (1973), and to “reply with rebutting language suitable to the occasion.” United States v. Praetorius, 622 F. 2d 1054, 1061 (2d Cir.1979) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860, 101 S.Ct. 162, 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (198…
• United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …on a reasoned decision according to the evidence, not on time constraints. We therefore hold that the district court’s statements to the jury, in context, were not coercive. See United States v. Miller, 478 F. 2d 1315, 1320 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 851, 94 S.Ct. 144, 38 L.Ed.2d 100 (1973). III. Appellants claim that the district court made a number of erroneous rulings which warrant reversal. First, they argue that it was reversible error for the court to allow Government witness Drew Sommerfor…
• United States v. Arroyo-Angulo, 580 F.2d 1137 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …, 95 S.Ct. 1682, 44 L.Ed.2d 104 (1975). One purpose for which such similar acts may be introduced is to prove knowledge, intent, identity, and plan or design. Fed.R.Ev. 404(b); United States v. Miller, 478 F. 2d 1315, 1318 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 851, 94 S.Ct. 144, 38 L.Ed.2d 100 (1973). The proof is admissible even if the acts occurred after the crime charged in the indictment. United States v. Cavallaro, 553 F. 2d 300 (2d Cir. 1977); United States v. Rosenwasser, supra; United States v. Grad…